Stem Cell Options - March 2012

Let’s suspend for a moment our preconceived positions on the issue of embryonic stem-cell research. Assume temporarily that the vast majority of scientists who claim that embryonic stem  cells offer unique therapeutic potential are correct. Of course the treatments and cures, if and when they materialize,  will be worth billions of dollars to the patent holders who get there first. Whether the disease is autism, cerebral palsy, MS, Parkinson’s, spinal cord injury, stroke, or any of the myriad of illnesses in which embryonic stem cells may prove helpful,  many patients and their families will gladly pay whatever it takes.  Now let’s suppose that the patient is the child of an individual whose beliefs oppose the use of embryonic stem cells in this way.  That individual will have two options – allow his/her child to continue suffering and perhaps die prematurely, or submit to a type of treatment the he/she philosophically opposes.  Are there more than a handful of zealots who would choose the former alternative? I think not. 

The politico-religious advocacy of those determined to block advancements in this area may slow America’s efforts, but will prove irrelevant in the global competition.  China, known for its brilliant scientists and its ability to fund such research, will be among the first to cross the finish line. Russia will not stand idly by. Europe is already a player. So the quandary over whether to honor their prejudices or save their child will eventually confront many of the anti-progress activists.  Confronted with this moral dilemma, some will elect to access the treatment while hiding their participation.  Thus the moral bottom line is that they will chose hypocrisy over science.

Another point for the Luddites to ponder is that nothing they do will have any effect on  how embryos are harvested.  American scientists with a specialization in embryonic stem-cell research will simply go to other countries where their expertise is welcome, where rewards may prove greater, and where they are not vilified by those unqualified to debate the issue.   Somewhere along the way, a treatment derived from embryonic stem cells may save the life of a future president, or even a community organizer who personally improves thousands of lives.

But we live in a country in which the militancy of people who can barely imagine the complexity of a cell may determine whether America is allowed to move forward in this vital area of research. These people’s expertise lies in less practical areas, such as how best to advocate the commands of an organization that replaces thought with mumbo jumbo.  Can’t we pass a law that says that those who oppose science now will not be allowed to enjoy its benefits in the future?  If so, I am willing to submit to a law that forbids me from enjoying any of the future benefits of religion. Besides, why do they need science when they have access to something far more powerful, the healing power of the creator of the universe with whom they are in daily contact.

Distributing the Wealth - January 2012

How are we doing on income distribution? To look at 2011 luxury car sales, it hard not to get the impression things are moving in the right direction for the 1%. Bentley sales were up worldwide by 37% in 2011, 32% in the U.S with just over 2000 sold. Mercedes reported its best sales year ever, with an increase of 17.5%. BMW was up by 14.9%, its second best year ever in the U.S. December 2011 was the strongest month for several manufacturers, a good sign for 2012.

Except for some low end (but very cute) two-seater models of the BMW, none of these cars are made in the USA, so they fit nicely with the Republican philosophy that job creators – people who buy luxury cars – are doing their part regardless of the country the job is created in.

American Exceptionalism - January 2012

Are there reasons for voting Republican this November (2012)? Many! And you may find them persuasive. For starters, if you feel wealthy people are being treated shabbily by our government, the Republican party has promised to attack that problem.  If you believe America will become more successful in the worldwide competition for jobs by providing less education to its citizens, the Republican Party has already proven its ability to lead in dumbing down our children. If you maintain that healthcare should be limited to people who share your values, then the entire group of Republican candidates still in the presidential race are fully behind you.

But there’s much more. If you have determined that the best way to prove America’s exceptionalism is to start another trillion-dollar war in the Middle East, your party stands ready to get tough with Iran.  If you deem certain kinds of “uppity” people as unworthy of running our government and are determined to “take back our country”, you don’t need to look far for a political party to support your view. If you are confident that taking the U.S. to the brink of default and signing pledges never to raise taxes is a clever way to put our government in its place, look no further.  If you approve of boycotting the State of the Union address or shouting “Liar!” from the floor when the President is speaking, then your choice is clear. If doing whatever you want to whomever you please and then requesting a pass from Jesus is your kind of religion, the Gingrich/Santorum wing of the party sees salvation in the same light.

But some of the most compelling reasons for voting Republican have yet to be mentioned. For example, if you shun compromise, the principle on which our democracy operates, so does your party.  If you think that the Majority Leader of the Senate should ignore legislative priorities and dedicate himself and his party to the defeat of the President, have I got a recommendation for you!  If you wish to vote for a political party that kowtows to a radio talk show host who often appears demented, that opportunity is at hand. If you hope to eliminate regulations, such as those that get in the way of your enjoyment of lead paint and asbestos, the anti-regulation party has a home for you. And if you will fight for the right to encourage your child’s obesity without government interference, then punish those pesky Democrats by voting Republican.

This review of Republican positions should help you select the party you believe will take America in the right direction.  But if not, get in touch. This is merely the short list.